linux-kernel - Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 20 May 2017 10:56:25 +0900
From:   "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@...il.com>
To:     Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
        jani.nikula@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from handlers

"J. R. Okajima":
> I don't know whether the fix is good to me or not yet. I will test your
> fix, but I am busy now and my test will be a few weeks later. Other
> people may want the fix soon. So I'd suggest you to reproduce the
> problem on your side. I guess "mem=1G" or "mem=512M" will make it easier
> to reproduce the problem.
> Of course, if you are sure the fix is correct, then you don't have to
> wait for my test. Release it soon for other people.

Now I am going to able to run my local test.
But V3 patch failed to apply onto v4.11.0.

Would you provide us two versions of the patch, one for v4.11 series and
the other of v4.12-rcN?


J. R. Okajima