[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOoAuqhY_+G=8Dwrt6aJ7YXTwcHShxLEVzt6MeNYAhT9PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 15:20:36 -0700
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] DWARF: add the config option
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 1:01 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> (H.J., could we get a binutils feature that allows is to do:
>>>>
>>>> pushq %whatever
>>>> .cfi_adjust_sp -8
>>>> ...
>>>> popq %whatever
>>>> .cfi_adjust_sp 8
>>>>
>>
>> Np. Compiler needs to generate this.
>>
>
> How would the compiler generate this when inline asm is involved? For
> the kernel, objtool could get around the need to have these
> annotations, but not so much for user code? Is the compiler supposed
> to parse the inline asm? Would the compiler provide some magic % code
> to represent the current CFA base register?
Here is one example of inline asm with call frame info:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sigaction.c;h=be058bac436d1cc9794b2b03107676ed99f6b872;hb=HEAD
--
H.J.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists