[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170520090451.GA406@tigerII.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 18:04:51 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: Use the main logbuf in NMI when logbuf_lock
is available
On (05/19/17 15:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > [..]
> >
> > > the problem is that
> > >
> > > `PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK || PRINTK_NMI_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_MASK' is 0x01
> >
> > d'oh... forgot to copy-paste this...
>
> Grrr, thanks a lot for chasing this down and I am sorry for the troubles.
no worries :)
> I have rebased both for-4.13 and for-next branches in printk.git
> with this fix. I wanted to get rid of this bug in linux-next
> ASAP. Please, let me know if you would prefer to handle
> this another way in the future.
we are cool ;) thanks.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists