[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97a8ffc4-dd0f-3e2a-0dc4-1ac46c993745@suse.com>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 12:52:05 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM fixes for v4.12-rc2
On 20/05/17 00:21, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I noticed that my diffstat didn't match either the KVM or the Xen pull.
>
> The *reason* seems to be that both Radim and Juergen have enabled the
> "patience" diff, because if I add "--patience" to the diff line, I get
> the same numbers you guys report.
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> 28 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
>
> Without "--patience" (the default) I get:
>
> 28 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
>
> which is close, but not the exact same thing.
>
> So I don't mind people using the patience version of the diffing code,
> but on the whole it's a loss as often as it is a win, so I'm wondering
> _why_ you do this? Is there some other project that has started
> suggesting using the patience diff (either with a command line option
> or by just doing
>
> git config diff.algorithm patience
>
> anyway, it's not a big deal, I'm just curious..
In my case it was a patch which was much easier to review using the
patience diff. I just didn't switch back afterwards (what I did now).
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists