[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E607265CB020454880711A6F96C05A030106862B33@hasmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 08:07:08 +0000
From: "Levy, Amir (Jer)" <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
"Jamet, Michael" <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
"Bernat, Yehezkel" <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Mario.Limonciello@...l.com" <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>,
"Jared.Dominguez@...l.com" <Jared.Dominguez@...l.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 18/24] thunderbolt: Store Thunderbolt generation in the
switch structure
On Sun, May 21 2017, 11:00 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:40:41AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 07:35:21AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 05:29:47AM +0000, Levy, Amir (Jer) wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 21 2017, 07:47 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:39:08PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + default:
> > > > > > + sw->generation = 1;
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > >
> > > > > If someone adds an entry for, say, a new TB3 controller to
> > > > > nhi_ids[] but forgets to update this function, the controller is
> > > > > assigned the wrong generation number. It might be better to
> > > > > make TB3 the default and list each TB1 controller instead since
> > > > > it's less likely for Intel to introduce an older gen chip.
> > > > >
> > > > > Generally I think it's problematic to require that multiple
> > > > > files are touched whenever a new controller is added. Isn't the
> > > > > generation number or link speed (10/20/40) stored in some
> > > > > register in PCI config space (VSEC 0x1234) or TB config space?
> > > >
> > > > How about setting information, that isn't available from PCI, in
> > > > pci_device_id.driver_data when initializing nhi_ids[]?
> > >
> > > Right, that would also be possible, though reading the generation
> > > number from a register would be more elegant, if such a register exists.
> >
> > I don't think there is such register but I can put this information to
> > the driver_data instead.
>
> Actually these are Thunderbolt switch IDs, not NHI PCI IDs so I don't think
> driver_data is the right place after all. So if no objections, I'll update the
> function to default to TBT3 but keep the switch case and add the TBT1 IDs +
> Win Ridge there.
There is correlation between switch ID to NHI ID.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists