[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63c0ec55-9cb7-50a0-2020-fe17283e532b@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:35:07 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <peterz@...radead.org>, <bgregg@...flix.com>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>, <qinteng@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] samples/bpf: add samples for HW_CACHE / RAW
events
On 5/22/17 4:26 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:48:40 -0700
>
>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static unsigned long long (*bpf_get_current_uid_gid)(void) =
>> (void *) BPF_FUNC_get_current_uid_gid;
>> static int (*bpf_get_current_comm)(void *buf, int buf_size) =
>> (void *) BPF_FUNC_get_current_comm;
>> -static int (*bpf_perf_event_read)(void *map, int index) =
>> +static u64 (*bpf_perf_event_read)(void *map, u64 flags) =
>> (void *) BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read;
>
> If the second argument really is "u64 flags", then please update
> the comments in tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h as well.
of course.
As independent patch, I assume.
For both tools/include/uapi/...bpf.h and include/uapi/...bpf.h
It has some info:
/* BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output and BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read flags. */
#define BPF_F_INDEX_MASK 0xffffffffULL
#define BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU BPF_F_INDEX_MASK
yet perf_event_read() is least documented. hmm.
* u64 bpf_perf_event_read(&map, index)
* Return: Number events read or error code
that needs to be fixed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists