[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170522100648.q65ubrw2aannwtjn@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 11:06:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: Add support for TI ADC1x8s102
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 05:26:30PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Just to clarify what do we do here, where a regulator is providing a
> reference voltage and there appears to be no information on it in ACPI?
> Right now we are just going with a fixed value that matches the board
> someone has, but that's hardly sustainable.
Yes, the ACPI people need to come up with some standard regulator
bindings for this sort of application.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists