[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ffb088d6-e40f-7a7d-dafb-e52dc86704fc@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:35:43 +0530
From: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: robin.murphy@....com, will.deacon@....com, joro@...tes.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, tn@...ihalf.com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
okaya@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, j.neuschaefer@....net,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, magnus.damm@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] ACPI/IORT: Ignore all errors except EPROBE_DEFER
Hi Lorenzo,
On 5/22/2017 4:07 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi Sricharan,
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 08:24:16PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>> While deferring the probe of IOMMU masters, xlate and
>> add_device callbacks called from iort_iommu_configure
>> can pass back error values like -ENODEV, which means
>> the IOMMU cannot be connected with that master for real
>> reasons. Before the IOMMU probe deferral, all such errors
>> were ignored. Now all those errors are propagated back,
>> killing the master's probe for such errors. Instead ignore
>> all the errors except EPROBE_DEFER, which is the only one
>> of concern and let the master work without IOMMU, thus
>> restoring the old behavior.
>>
>> Fixes: 5a1bb638d567 ("drivers: acpi: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error")
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> [V4] Added this patch newly.
>>
>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> index c5fecf9..16e101f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> @@ -782,6 +782,12 @@ const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev)
>> if (err)
>> ops = ERR_PTR(err);
>>
>> + /* Ignore all other errors apart from EPROBE_DEFER */
>> + if (IS_ERR(ops) && (PTR_ERR(ops) != -EPROBE_DEFER)) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Adding to IOMMU failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(ops));
>> + ops = NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> return ops;
>> }
>>
>
> It is getting a bit convoluted. Is not it better to propagate the
> error back and let acpi_dma_configure() make a decision accordingly ?
>
ok, I was trying to keep it in same way as DT, where of_dma_configure
(here acpi_dma_configure) calls of_iommu_configure(here iort_iommu_configure)
which ends up doing the check. So will have to be changed in both places
for symmetry.
> Something like:
>
> -- >8 --
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index e39ec7b..3a10d757 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1371,8 +1371,8 @@ int acpi_dma_configure(struct device *dev, enum dev_dma_attr attr)
> iort_set_dma_mask(dev);
>
> iommu = iort_iommu_configure(dev);
> - if (IS_ERR(iommu))
> - return PTR_ERR(iommu);
> + if (IS_ERR(iommu) && PTR_ERR(iommu) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
In case of other errors apart from EPROBE_DEFER,
iommu = NULL should be set, before passing it on to
arch_setup_dma_ops.
Regards,
Sricharan
>
> size = max(dev->coherent_dma_mask, dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1);
> /*
>
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists