lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1705221333150.26873@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 13:34:24 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] DWARF: add the config option

On Sat, 20 May 2017, H.J. Lu wrote:

> >>>> pushq %whatever
> >>>> .cfi_adjust_sp -8
> >>>> ...
> >>>> popq %whatever
> >>>> .cfi_adjust_sp 8
> >>>>
> >>
> >> Np.  Compiler needs to generate this.
> >>
> >
> > How would the compiler generate this when inline asm is involved?  For
> > the kernel, objtool could get around the need to have these
> > annotations, but not so much for user code?  Is the compiler supposed
> > to parse the inline asm?  Would the compiler provide some magic % code
> > to represent the current CFA base register?
> 
> Here is one example of inline asm with call frame info:
> 
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sigaction.c;h=be058bac436d1cc9794b2b03107676ed99f6b872;hb=HEAD

That brings us basically pretty close to square one though; having to 
maintain "manual" anotations. Something we're pretty much trying to avoid 
through this excercise.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ