lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:19:09 +0200 From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com> To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com> CC: <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, <paul.burton@...tec.com>, <rabinv@...s.com>, <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>, <james.hogan@...tec.com>, <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <frowand.list@...il.com>, <Sergey.Semin@...latforms.ru>, <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] MIPS memblock: Remove bootmem code and switch to NO_BOOTMEM Hi Serge, On 22.05.2017 12:26, Serge Semin wrote: > Regarding the patchset. I'm still pretty much eager to make it being > part of kernel MIPS arch. But there was a problem I outlined > in the patchset header message, which I can't fix by myself. > Particulary It's connected with Loonson3 or SGI IP27 code alteration, > so to make it free of ancient boot_mem_map dependencies (see the > patchset header message). Without a help from someone, who has > Loonson64 and SGI IP27 hardware and strong desire to make it free of > old bootmem allocator, it is useless to make any progress from my > side. That's why Ralf moved this email-thread into RFC actually. > Anyway If either you or someone else has got such hardware and is > interested in the cooperation, I'll be more than happy to push > my efforts forward with this patchset contribution. But only after > I got a bit less busy with my work. As I said it will happen within > next 1-2 months. So do you have the hardware and desire to be part > of this? I should be able to update/test the changes on a Loongson64 platform. Marcin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists