[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e81aa26-e43e-6264-e2f9-547531b809f5@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:41:08 -0400
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [v4 1/1] mm: Adaptive hash table scaling
>
> This is just too ugly to live, really. If we do not need adaptive
> scaling then just make it #if __BITS_PER_LONG around the code. I would
> be fine with this. A big fat warning explaining why this is 64b only
> would be appropriate.
>
OK, let me prettify it somehow, and I will send a new patch out.
Pasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists