linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix mdp device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 16:16:09 +0200
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        daniel.thompson@...aro.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
        Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
        Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>,
        Houlong Wei <houlong.wei@...iatek.com>
Cc:     srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
        Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Wu-Cheng Li <wuchengli@...gle.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix mdp device tree

On 05/22/2017 04:14 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22/05/17 11:09, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 05/12/2017 05:22 AM, Minghsiu Tsai wrote:
>>
>> Who should take care of the dtsi changes? I'm not sure who maintains the mdp dts.
> 
> I will take care of the dtsi patches.
> 
>>
>> The driver change and the dtsi change need to be in sync, so it is probably easiest
>> to merge this via one tree.
>>
>> Here is my Acked-by for these three patches:
>>
>> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
>>
>> I can take all three, provided I have the Ack of the mdp dts maintainer. Or it can
>> go through him with my Ack.
>>
> 
> I think we should provide backwards compability instead, as proposed here:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2017-May/008811.html
> 
> If this change is ok for you, please let Minghsiu know so that he can 
> provide a v4.

That's a lot better. In that case I can take the media patches and you the dts.

I'll wait for the v4.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
>> Regards,
>>
>> 	Hans
>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Upload patches again because forget to add v2 in title
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Update commit message
>>>
>>> If the mdp_* nodes are under an mdp sub-node, their corresponding
>>> platform device does not automatically get its iommu assigned properly.
>>>
>>> Fix this by moving the mdp component nodes up a level such that they are
>>> siblings of mdp and all other SoC subsystems.  This also simplifies the
>>> device tree.
>>>
>>> Although it fixes iommu assignment issue, it also break compatibility
>>> with old device tree. So, the patch in driver is needed to iterate over
>>> sibling mdp device nodes, not child ones, to keep driver work properly.
>>>
>>> Daniel Kurtz (2):
>>>    arm64: dts: mt8173: Fix mdp device tree
>>>    media: mtk-mdp: Fix mdp device tree
>>>
>>> Minghsiu Tsai (1):
>>>    dt-bindings: mt8173: Fix mdp device tree
>>>
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-mdp.txt     |  12 +-
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi           | 126 ++++++++++-----------
>>>   drivers/media/platform/mtk-mdp/mtk_mdp_core.c      |   2 +-
>>>   3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>>>
>>