[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2CfOPNe5KnSWb=xf_0YTtN6aQRwNthQXEDb9YgOrLMaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:29:31 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: apds990x: move header file out of I2C realm
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> include/linux/i2c is not for client devices. Move the header file to a
> more appropriate location.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
> ---
> drivers/misc/apds990x.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/{i2c => platform_data}/apds990x.h | 0
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> rename include/linux/{i2c => platform_data}/apds990x.h (100%)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/apds990x.c b/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
> index dfb72ecfa60461..c341164edaad01 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> -#include <linux/i2c/apds990x.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_data/apds990x.h>
The new location is clearly better than the old, but I notice that in both
patches, there is not a single definition for the platform_data structure
in the kernel and both drivers refuse to load when they do not get
passed valid platform_data.
Should we also remove the drivers or move them into staging?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists