[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5db9579f-00b6-7389-1113-7ddae5fc4f3f@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:35:48 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xen: add sysfs node for guest type
On 05/22/2017 09:33 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/05/17 09:57, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Currently there is no reliable user interface inside a Xen guest to
>> determine its type (e.g. HVM, PV or PVH). Instead of letting user mode
>> try to determine this by various rather hacky mechanisms (parsing of
>> boot messages before they are gone, trying to make use of known subtle
>> differences in behavior of some instructions), add a sysfs node
>> /sys/hypervisor/guest_type to explicitly deliver this information as
>> it is known to the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor | 13 +++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c | 6 ++++--
>> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 1 +
>> drivers/xen/sys-hypervisor.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> include/xen/xen.h | 2 ++
>> 7 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
>> index 443196f0aa1c..06850f74ebd4 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
>> @@ -19,6 +19,19 @@ Contact: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
>> Description:
>> Compiler which was used to build the Xen hypervisor
>>
>> +What: /sys/hypervisor/guest_type
>> +Date: May 2017
>> +KernelVersion: 4.12
>> +Contact: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
>> +Description:
>> + Type of guest:
>> + "native": standard guest type on arm
>> + "HVM": fully virtualized guest (x86)
>> + "PV": paravirtualized guest (x86)
>> + "PVH": fully virtualized guest without legacy emulation (x86)
>> + "PVHVM": fully virtualized guest using paravirtualized
>> + interfaces (e.g. interrupts, timers) (x86)
> I'm not sure this is wise split. PVHVM is a spectrum which changes
> dynamically, especially in the presence of hardware APIC support.
>
> I'd suggest guest type being straight PV or HVM (being the container
> type), and a list of items (interrupts, timers, legacy emulation) which
> are either using paravirt or native interfaces, or are not used at all.
Can these be exposed via HVM CPUID leaf?
-boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists