linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4] wlcore: add wl1285 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 17:44:24 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk, sre@...nel.org,
        tony@...mide.com, marcel@...tmann.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] wlcore: add wl1285 compatible

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:28:20 +0300
>
>> Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk> writes:
>> 
>>> Motorola Droid 4 uses a WL1285C. With differences between the
>>> chips not being public let's add explicit binding for wl1285
>>> instead of relying on wl1283 being very similar.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
>>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> I previously send this in two patches, but its hard to apply without
>>> requiring multiple kernel releases (the driver must be updated before
>>> the DTS change). Since the actual change is not very complex Marcel
>>> Holtmann & Tony Lindgren suggested, that I send this directly to you
>>> in a single patch for inclusion into 4.12. This also means, that the
>>> remaining series can be queued normally for 4.13.
>> 
>> I noticed that Dave set this patch to Awaiting Upstream state on his
>> patchwork:
>> 
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/759042/
>> 
>> Which makes me suspect that he is waiting me to apply this (as I
>> normally apply wlcore patches). Dave, should I actually take this patch?
>> What do you prefer?
>
> Anything that touches wireless drivers I defer to you, yes.

Thanks, I'll take it then. Not sure why Sebastian was suggested to
submit this patch via your tree in the first place.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9713645/

-- 
Kalle Valo