linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ALSA: sound/isa: constify snd_kcontrol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5hpof1ieva.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 08:29:13 +0200
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        perex@...ex.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: sound/isa: constify snd_kcontrol_new structures

On Mon, 22 May 2017 08:20:45 +0200,
Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 22 May 2017, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 May 2017 14:33:45 +0200,
> > > Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, 17 May 2017 13:38:56 +0200,
> > >> > Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Declare snd_kcontrol_new structures as const as they are only passed an
> > >> >> argument to the function snd_ctl_new1. This argument is of type const,
> > >> >> so snd_kcontrol_new structures having this property can be made const.
> > >> >> Done using Coccinelle:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> @r disable optional_qualifier@
> > >> >> identifier x;
> > >> >> position p;
> > >> >> @@
> > >> >> static struct snd_kcontrol_new x@......};
> > >> >>
> > >> >> @ok@
> > >> >> identifier r.x;
> > >> >> position p;
> > >> >> @@
> > >> >> snd_ctl_new1(&x@p,...)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> @bad@
> > >> >> position p != {r.p,ok.p};
> > >> >> identifier r.x;
> > >> >> @@
> > >> >> x@p
> > >> >>
> > >> >> @depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@
> > >> >> identifier r.x;
> > >> >> @@
> > >> >> +const
> > >> >> struct snd_kcontrol_new x;
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > As I already asked, could you send as a patchset if you have multiple
> > >> > similar patches?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Sure. Will combine the already sent ones and some new ones into a
> > >> patchset and send again.
> > >
> > > Well, since there haven't been new submissions and the patches are
> > > trivial, I applied the existing four patches.  If you have newer ones,
> > > please submit as a patchset.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > Thanks for applying the patches.
> > I have a doubt that since some of my coming patches are for the sound
> > subsystem containing similar changes and you will be applying those,
> > so can I combine and put all the changes in a single patch or sending
> > a patchset would be a correct way.
> 
> I think he means that when you have more sound patches, just do them all
> at once.

Yes, that's my point.

You've sent each patch individually, and this made me difficult to
pick up, as I had to wonder "is this really all?" (then 10 minutes
later another patch arrived :)

At best, submit all the relevant patches via git-send-email with the
proper cover letter in a single thread.


thanks,

Takashi