[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170522063746.GA1454@katana>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 08:37:46 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] hwmon: move include files out of include/linux/i2c
Hi Guenter,
> > Note that some files don't seem to have upstream
> > users in board code, so they maybe could even be removed? I didn't check for
>
> While I understand where you are coming from, I am not typically that aggressive.
> Such removals force vendors who are not really forthcoming with upstreaming to
> deviate even further from upstream. It makes them even less likely to submit their
> code upstream, and it may result in enforcing their belief that upstream doesn't
> really care about vendors struggling to release boards and systems to their
> customers.
I clearly see your point. I meant more the case where platform_data
became cruft because platforms moved to DT. I agree this is not so much
the case for HWMON but it was true for the I2C master driver where I
could remove the platform data and could save the include file and some
code. That was just a nice cleanup.
> >I prefer the series to go upstream via the subsystem tree; if you prefer that I
> >take it via I2C, just let me know.
> >
> Series applied to hwmon-next.
Super, thanks!
Regards,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists