[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfLJ_mLEts_C7tqaXRWs3E=+3TRddRJihYS2eDT=YMQJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 20:12:17 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use dmi_system_id table
for retrieving frequency
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> Avoids reimplementation of DMI matching in intel_quark_i2c_setup.
What's wrong with current approach? I suppose this will make sense
when we will have an issue / impediment. Right now it looks like
over-engineering.
(Yes, I know what I said to you about this earlier, OTOH see above)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists