[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdZpSYOmF9p-WpYGAkZtktQMY3auoXN1JBssdhBXkygWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 20:36:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use dmi_system_id table
for retrieving frequency
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> On 2017-05-22 19:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>>> On 2017-05-22 19:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-05-22 19:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>>>> And since there is no difference to the frequency the name is enough.
>>>> So, I wouldn't go with this series as is. See above.
>>>
>>> Nope: Just like for the stmmac, we need to include the asset tags to
>>> avoid matching variations of the devices which may carry the same board
>>> name. While I will try to avoid that this happens, we are better safe
>>> than sorry here.
>>
>> Do we have an issue right now?
>> Yes / No
>
> Andy, we are trying to design a robust upstream driver here, no ad-hoc
> BSP that will not survive the hardware anyway.
You didn't answer my question...
I do not see a good point to solve the issue that might happen in the future.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists