[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170522202416.1c48d91a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 20:24:16 +0200
From: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] ARM: dts: armada-385-linksys: use binary unit
prefixes
On Mon, 22 May 2017 17:00:01 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:48:57PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > Use IEEE 1541-2002 unit prefixes for sizes.
>
> Does ePAPR recommend this?
Not directly, but the paper (v1.1) itself is using MiB as well which
could be seen as a recommendation.
SI and NIST to my knowledge explicitly state to not use SI prefixes for
anything but powers of 10. Also as far as I'm aware any relevant
standard body adopted / endorsed these.
>
> I think this looks ugly, so i would not do it.
Needs getting used to indeed. I for myself I can say I've gotten over
it by now. Grepping the Linux tree shows quite a few other examples of
MiB so this one wont feel lonely either.
Ralph
Powered by blists - more mailing lists