[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0DDEC9E2-43EC-4559-B178-BE9F38EA676B@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 22:20:01 +0200
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Kernal <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX] block, bfq: access and cache blkg data only when safe
> Il giorno 19 mag 2017, alle ore 16:37, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> ha scritto:
>
> On 05/19/2017 02:39 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> @@ -692,8 +725,7 @@ void bfq_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
>> /*
>> * The idle tree may still contain bfq_queues belonging
>> * to exited task because they never migrated to a different
>> - * cgroup from the one being destroyed now. No one else
>> - * can access them so it's safe to act without any lock.
>> ++ * cgroup from the one being destroyed now.
>> */
>> bfq_flush_idle_tree(st);
>>
>
> Looks like an extra '+' snuck into that hunk.
>
Yes, sorry. Before possibly submitting a fixed version, I'll wait for
a reply on my previous email in this thread, as the issue now seems
more serious to me, and affecting CFQ too.
Thanks,
Paolo
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists