linux-kernel - Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFx2hDWoiQn2S=wHv7AQHvkq+D38EhVu67qbrHdhyGw6Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 13:28:03 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.12

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
> Can you try e2c824924cdb41 ("i2c: designware: Fix bogus sda_hold_time
> due to uninitialized vars") from my for-current branch? I am waiting for
> buildbot results before I send out the pull request.

Have not tested that commit, but did verify that yes it was the i2c
pull, and am about to reboot into a kernel that just zeroes those
variables beforehand (which seems to be the same thing that commit
does, although it also moves lines around for some unfathomable
reason).

             Linus