[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0iSm682vPuva6mTk479xx92Ho2uyV07J4_iN_THEsGZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 22:36:52 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@...ian.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: hide unused 'touchpad_store'
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> A readonly sysfs property must not have a 'store' function:
>>
>> drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c:438:16: error: 'touchpad_store' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>>
>> We can either comment it out or remove the function entirely,
>> without a good reason one or or another I picked the second option.
>
> Hmm... I was expecting something like this but didn't get a single
> error from kbuild bot.
>
>>
>> Fixes: 7f363145992c ("platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: Switch touchpad attribute to be RO")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
>> index f7a4608cc60b..c4c7ae3179c0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
>> @@ -435,6 +435,8 @@ static ssize_t touchpad_show(struct device *dev,
>> return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", result);
>> }
>>
>> +#if 0
>> +/* Switch to RO for now: It might be revisited in the future */
>
> Can we use __maybe_unused instead?
Sure, whichever you prefer. I guess you'll just commit that patch yourself then?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists