[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0192326e-2abc-5bc2-07c9-fa15f2e31372@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:16:08 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] DWARF: add the config option
On 05/22/17 04:12, Ingo Molnar wrote:
\>>
>> This construct might be useful for other arches, which is why I called
>> it "FP" instead of "BP". But then I ruined that with the last 3 :-)
>
> Please call it BP - 'FP' can easily be read as floating-point, making it all
> super-confusing. We should use canonical x86 register names and ordering - even
> if not all registers are used straight away.
>
Seriously, I suspect that at the end of the day we will have reinvented
DWARF.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists