lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 14:39:25 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zlib: Put get_unaligned16() inside #ifdef block

On Mon, 22 May 2017 14:13:26 -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:

> The function is not used when CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y.
> Adding the #ifdef fixes the following warning when building with clang:
> 
> lib/zlib_inflate/inffast.c:31:1: error: unused function 'get_unaligned16'
>     [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/lib/zlib_inflate/inffast.c
> +++ b/lib/zlib_inflate/inffast.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ union uu {
>  	unsigned char b[2];
>  };
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
>  /* Endian independed version */
>  static inline unsigned short
>  get_unaligned16(const unsigned short *p)
> @@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ get_unaligned16(const unsigned short *p)
>  	mm.b[1] = b[1];
>  	return mm.us;
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef POSTINC
>  #  define OFF 0

Do we really want to mucky up the source code to keep clang happy?  gcc
won't warn about an unused static inline.  Can we configure clang to do
the same?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ