linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] kernel/locking: Fix compile error with qrwlock.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9cf41ab6-0aea-4c63-9577-65a06f661312@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 16:57:39 -0500
From:   Babu Moger <babu.moger@...cle.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de,
        shannon.nelson@...cle.com, haakon.bugge@...cle.com,
        steven.sistare@...cle.com, vijay.ac.kumar@...cle.com,
        jane.chu@...cle.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] kernel/locking: Fix compile error with qrwlock.c


On 5/22/2017 2:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@...cle.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 18:16:55 -0600
>
>> Some architectures use the following guard in include file
>>   "asm/spinlock_types.h" to discourage including the file directly.
>>
>> Saw these compile errors on SPARC when queued rwlock feature is enabled.
>>
>>    CC      kernel/locking/qrwlock.o
>> In file included from ./include/asm-generic/qrwlock_types.h:5,
>>                   from ./arch/sparc/include/asm/qrwlock.h:4,
>>                   from kernel/locking/qrwlock.c:24:
>> ./arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h:5:3: error:
>>          #error "please don't include this file directly"
>>
>> Re-arrange the includes in qrwlock_types.h and include spinlock.h
>> in qrwlock.c to fix it.
>>
>> Also will be removing this stanza from SPARC. Stay tuned.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Vijay Kumar <vijay.ac.kumar@...cle.com>
> In my feedback I said to remove that check from
> sparc's asm/spinlock_types.h header.
>
> Which you do in patch #2
>
> But that means this patch #1 here is no longer necessary, since we
> conform to the hearder scheme used by other architectures using queued
> locks.
>
> So please remove this patch from the series.
Sorry. I did not make it clear. Patch #2 addresses this following problem.

./arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h:5:3: error:
#error "please don't include this file directly"

But we still have this following problem. So we needed part of the patch #1.

   CC      kernel/locking/qrwlock.o
kernel/locking/qrwlock.c: In function ‘queued_read_lock_slowpath’:
kernel/locking/qrwlock.c:89: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘arch_spin_lock’
kernel/locking/qrwlock.c:102: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘arch_spin_unlock’
make[4]: *** [kernel/locking/qrwlock.o] Error 1

To address this we need following change.
============================================
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
index cc3ed0c..2655f26 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
  #include <linux/percpu.h>
  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
  #include <asm/qrwlock.h>

  /*
I will update the patch set with the above information. Does that work?

> Thank you.