[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170523200912.185694487@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 22:08:56 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 119/164] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Do not use Active+Pending state for a HW interrupt
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
commit ddf42d068f8802de122bb7efdfcb3179336053f1 upstream.
When an interrupt is injected with the HW bit set (indicating that
deactivation should be propagated to the physical distributor),
special care must be taken so that we never mark the corresponding
LR with the Active+Pending state (as the pending state is kept in
the physycal distributor).
Fixes: 140b086dd197 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add GICv2 world switch backend")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
@@ -168,6 +168,13 @@ void vgic_v2_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu
if (irq->hw) {
val |= GICH_LR_HW;
val |= irq->hwintid << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
+ /*
+ * Never set pending+active on a HW interrupt, as the
+ * pending state is kept at the physical distributor
+ * level.
+ */
+ if (irq->active && irq_is_pending(irq))
+ val &= ~GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT;
} else {
if (irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL)
val |= GICH_LR_EOI;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists