lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 14:09:46 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Ivan Mikhaylov <ivan@...ibm.com>,
        Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au>,
        Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arch/powerpc/44x/fsp2: wdt tcr update instead of whole rewrite

Ivan Mikhaylov <ivan@...ibm.com> writes:
>
> From my point of view it's possible. I've checked docu and on idea
> it should be possible cause WP is only affecting watchdog ping time.

The question is, is there any chance that leaving those bits set on
another platform will cause a problem?

ie. on existing machines we always clear those bits, is it OK that we
will now start leaving those bits with whatever value they had.

cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ