[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170523200840.544523569@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 22:09:13 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jani Tuovila <tuovila@...opsys.com>,
Ari Kauppi <ari@...opsys.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.11 192/197] nfsd: fix undefined behavior in nfsd4_layout_verify
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ari Kauppi <ari@...opsys.com>
commit b550a32e60a4941994b437a8d662432a486235a5 upstream.
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:1262:34
shift exponent 128 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
Depending on compiler+architecture, this may cause the check for
layout_type to succeed for overly large values (which seems to be the
case with amd64). The large value will be later used in de-referencing
nfsd4_layout_ops for function pointers.
Reported-by: Jani Tuovila <tuovila@...opsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Ari Kauppi <ari@...opsys.com>
[colin.king@...onical.com: use LAYOUT_TYPE_MAX instead of 32]
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1259,7 +1259,8 @@ nfsd4_layout_verify(struct svc_export *e
return NULL;
}
- if (!(exp->ex_layout_types & (1 << layout_type))) {
+ if (layout_type >= LAYOUT_TYPE_MAX ||
+ !(exp->ex_layout_types & (1 << layout_type))) {
dprintk("%s: layout type %d not supported\n",
__func__, layout_type);
return NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists