[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170523200840.487347334@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 22:09:12 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.11 191/197] NFSv4: Fix an rcu lock leak
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
commit 2e84611b3f4fa50e1f4c12f2966fcc7fb955d944 upstream.
The intention in the original patch was to release the lock when
we put the inode, however something got screwed up.
Reported-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
Fixes: 7b410d9ce460f ("pNFS: Delay getting the layout header in..")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
@@ -131,10 +131,11 @@ restart:
if (!inode)
continue;
if (!nfs_sb_active(inode->i_sb)) {
- rcu_read_lock();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
iput(inode);
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
goto restart;
}
return inode;
@@ -170,10 +171,11 @@ restart:
if (!inode)
continue;
if (!nfs_sb_active(inode->i_sb)) {
- rcu_read_lock();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
iput(inode);
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
goto restart;
}
return inode;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists