linux-kernel - Re: [HMM 00/15] HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management) v22

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170523150526.1b8c11d13f2c9be2ae989ca5@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 15:05:26 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [HMM 00/15] HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management) v22

On Tue, 23 May 2017 18:02:49 -0400 Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com> wrote:

> Andrew i posted updated patch for 0007 0008 and 0009 as reply to orignal
> patches. It includes changes Dan and Kyrill wanted to see. I added the
> device_private_key to page_alloc.c to avoid modify more than 3 patches
> but if you prefer i can repost a v23 serie and move the static key to
> hmm.c
> 
> Also i guess posting a v23 would have it tested against builder as i
> doubt automatic builder are clever enough to understand all this.
> 

Yes please.  22->23 is less than a 5% increment ;)