Message-Id: <20170523200827.717985263@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 22:07:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.11 078/197] pid_ns: Fix race between setnsed fork() and zap_pid_ns_processes()

4.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>

commit 3fd37226216620c1a468afa999739d5016fbc349 upstream.

Imagine we have a pid namespace and a task from its parent's pid_ns,
which made setns() to the pid namespace. The task is doing fork(),
while the pid namespace's child reaper is dying. We have the race
between them:

Task from parent pid_ns             Child reaper
copy_process()                      ..
  alloc_pid()                       ..
  ..                                zap_pid_ns_processes()
  ..                                  disable_pid_allocation()
  ..                                  read_lock(&tasklist_lock)
  ..                                  iterate over pids in pid_ns
  ..                                    kill tasks linked to pids
  ..                                  read_unlock(&tasklist_lock)
  write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);   ..
  attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID);       ..
  ..                                ..

So, just created task p won't receive SIGKILL signal,
and the pid namespace will be in contradictory state.
Only manual kill will help there, but does the userspace
care about this? I suppose, the most users just inject
a task into a pid namespace and wait a SIGCHLD from it.

The patch fixes the problem. It simply checks for
(pid_ns->nr_hashed & PIDNS_HASH_ADDING) in copy_process().
We do it under the tasklist_lock, and can't skip
PIDNS_HASH_ADDING as noted by Oleg:

"zap_pid_ns_processes() does disable_pid_allocation()
and then takes tasklist_lock to kill the whole namespace.
Given that copy_process() checks PIDNS_HASH_ADDING
under write_lock(tasklist) they can't race;
if copy_process() takes this lock first, the new child will
be killed, otherwise copy_process() can't miss
the change in ->nr_hashed."

If allocation is disabled, we just return -ENOMEM
like it's made for such cases in alloc_pid().

v2: Do not move disable_pid_allocation(), do not
introduce a new variable in copy_process() and simplify
the patch as suggested by Oleg Nesterov.
Account the problem with double irq enabling
found by Eric W. Biederman.

Fixes: c876ad768215 ("pidns: Stop pid allocation when init dies")
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
CC: Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/fork.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1815,11 +1815,13 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_stru
 	*/
 	recalc_sigpending();
 	if (signal_pending(current)) {
-		spin_unlock(&current->sighand->siglock);
-		write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 		retval = -ERESTARTNOINTR;
 		goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
 	}
+	if (unlikely(!(ns_of_pid(pid)->nr_hashed & PIDNS_HASH_ADDING))) {
+		retval = -ENOMEM;
+		goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
+	}
 
 	if (likely(p->pid)) {
 		ptrace_init_task(p, (clone_flags & CLONE_PTRACE) || trace);
@@ -1877,6 +1879,8 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_stru
 	return p;
 
 bad_fork_cancel_cgroup:
+	spin_unlock(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 	cgroup_cancel_fork(p);
 bad_fork_free_pid:
 	cgroup_threadgroup_change_end(current);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists