lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170523082013.981693FAD4@swsrvapps-01.diasemi.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 09:20:13 +0100
From:   Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
CC:     Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] ASoC: da7218: Fix incorrect usage of bitwise '&' operator for
 SRM check

In the SRM lock check section of code the '&' bitwise operator is
used as part of checking lock status. Functionally the code works
as intended, but the conditional statement is a boolean comparison
so should really use '&&' logical operator instead. This commit
rectifies this discrepancy.

Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
Reviewed-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c
index d256ebf..6e1940e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c
@@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ static int da7218_dai_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
 				++i;
 				msleep(DA7218_SRM_CHECK_DELAY);
 			}
-		} while ((i < DA7218_SRM_CHECK_TRIES) & (!success));
+		} while ((i < DA7218_SRM_CHECK_TRIES) && (!success));

 		if (!success)
 			dev_warn(codec->dev, "SRM failed to lock\n");
--
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ