[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09a6bafa-5743-425e-8def-bd9219cd756c@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:38:17 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Define KB, MB, GB, TB in core VM
On 05/23/2017 09:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:11:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 May 2017 16:47:42 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There are many places where we define size either left shifting integers
>>> or multiplying 1024s without any generic definition to fall back on. But
>>> there are couples of (powerpc and lz4) attempts to define these standard
>>> memory sizes. Lets move these definitions to core VM to make sure that
>>> all new usage come from these definitions eventually standardizing it
>>> across all places.
>>
>> Grep further - there are many more definitions and some may now
>> generate warnings.
>>
>> Newly including mm.h for these things seems a bit heavyweight. I can't
>> immediately think of a more appropriate place. Maybe printk.h or
>> kernel.h.
>
> IFF we do these kernel.h is the right place. And please also add the
> MiB & co variants for the binary versions right next to the decimal
> ones.
Those defined in the patch are binary, not decimal. Do we even need
decimal ones?
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists