linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABxcv=n+BfADaoc0dG7hBBPZS2F6TtxgjhwBv8f=GVYSdjovGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 10:46:17 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are
 missing it

Hello Lee,

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@...hile0.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> thanks for the series.
>>>
>>> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches
>>> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I
>>> > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree.
>>>
>>> From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree. Since all
>
> Yes, I didn't mention 5 because is just a documentation change. But it
> would be better if is merged together with 2-4 indeed.
>
>>> I2C related patches have my tag, I assume they will be picked up by MFD.
>>> Lee, let me know if you prefer differently.
>>
>> I can pick them up, no problem.  Can the ARM patches be taking
>> independently?  I'm guessing they can since they are separate from one
>> another.
>>
>
> That's corect. The only platform changes that can't be picked
> independently from MFD are the ones in patch 2, but tha's why I added
> in the same patch. The OMAP folks (Tony and Aaro) already acked so you
> can pick it.
>

Is there anything else I need to do for you to pick this series?

Best regards,
Javier