[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec5747cf-0222-42eb-91fa-e67c4c0f3f61@mev.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 13:02:59 +0100
From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel.h: handle pointers to arrays better in
container_of()
On 23/05/17 12:24, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:32:02AM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
>
>>> #define container_of(ptr, type, member) ( \
>>> _Static_assert(__builtin_types_compatible_p( \
>>> typeof(*ptr), typeof( ((type *)0)->member )), "WUT"), \
>>> ((type *)((char *)(ptr) - offsetof(type, member))); \
>>> )
>>
>> It's a fine suggestion (if more parentheses are added), but _Static_assert
>> is a C11 feature, and I thought the kernel was using gnu89 (unless it's been
>> updated since).
>
> We have BUILD_BUG_ON() that should be similar in functionality.
Yes, I think BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() will be better in this case to avoid
some baggage. Also, __same_type() can be used for type checking.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@....co.uk> )=-
-=( Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/ )=-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists