linux-kernel - Re: RISC-V Linux Port v1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a00e3f7a-a145-5137-aa8f-d6e330067837@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 18:25:41 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, albert@...ive.com
Subject: Re: RISC-V Linux Port v1

On 05/22/17 18:16, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
> 
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
> 
>> In addition to the threaded messages, our port can be found on Git Hib
>>
>>   https://github.com/riscv/riscv-linux/tree/riscv-for-submission-v1
>>
>> [PATCH 1/7] RISC-V: Top-Level Makefile for riscv{32,64}
>> [PATCH 2/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv Makefile and Kconfigs
>> [PATCH 3/7] RISC-V: Device Tree Documentation
>> [PATCH 4/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/include
>> [PATCH 5/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/lib
>> [PATCH 6/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/kernel
>> [PATCH 7/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/mm
> 
> So, one overall comment on this patchset is that it's not bisectable
> (i.e. early patches add Makefile contents that refers to directories
> not yet introduced).
> 
> While it's not overly important to really split up a new architecture
> introduction into small incremental patches, we generally strive to
> have the tree fully buildable at any given commit. Some minor
> rearranging would alleviate these problems.

Neither the email patches nor the git tree have any Signed-off-by:
entries AFAICT.

-- 
~Randy