[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1495548049.30747.6.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 16:00:49 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@...el.com>,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com,
zhiyuan.lv@...el.com, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
zhi.a.wang@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g
Hi,
> + } else if (plane_id == INTEL_GVT_PLANE_CURSOR) {
> + c = &pipe->cursor;
> + if (c != NULL) {
> + info->start = c->base;
> + info->width = c->width;
> + info->height = c->height;
> + info->stride = c->width * (c->bpp / 8);
> + info->drm_format_mod = 0;
> + info->x_pos = c->x_pos;
> + info->y_pos = c->y_pos;
> + info->size = (((info->stride * c->height *
> c->bpp) / 8)
> + + (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) >>
> PAGE_SHIFT;
Leaves info->drm_format unset.
> +struct intel_vgpu_plane_info {
> + uint32_t plane_id;
> + uint32_t drm_format;
> + uint32_t width;
> + uint32_t height;
> + uint32_t stride;
> + uint32_t start;
> + uint32_t x_pos;
> + uint32_t y_pos;
> + uint32_t size;
> + uint64_t drm_format_mod;
> +};
drm_format_mod is unaligned. Should be avoided, otherwise the struct
layout is different on i386 and x86_64.
Patch 5/5 moves around this struct. Better have a separate patch
adding the structs and ioctls, order it before this one, so you don't
have to rename the stuff just added ...
> +struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf {
> + uint32_t fd;
> + struct intel_vgpu_plane_info plane_info;
> +};
Has alignment problems too.
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists