[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170523170319.GB24431@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:03:19 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
David Laight <david.laight@...lab.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>,
Phuong Nguyen <phuong_nguyen@...madesigns.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: Add tango MSI controller support
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:56:08PM +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 20/04/2017 16:28, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
> > +static int tango_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
> > + const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> > +{
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct irq_chip tango_chip = {
> > + .irq_ack = tango_ack,
> > + .irq_mask = tango_mask,
> > + .irq_unmask = tango_unmask,
> > + .irq_set_affinity = tango_set_affinity,
> > + .irq_compose_msi_msg = tango_compose_msi_msg,
> > +};
>
> Hmmm... I'm wondering why .irq_set_affinity is required.
>
> static int setup_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, struct cpumask *mask)
> first calls __irq_can_set_affinity() to check whether
> desc->irq_data.chip->irq_set_affinity) exists.
>
> then calls irq_do_set_affinity(&desc->irq_data, mask, false);
> which calls chip->irq_set_affinity(data, mask, force);
> = msi_domain_set_affinity()
> which calls parent->chip->irq_set_affinity() unconditionally.
>
> Would it make sense to test that the callback is implemented
> before calling it?
>
>
> [ 0.723895] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
I'm not sure what you're asking.
Is this a bug report for the v4 tango driver?
Or are you asking whether msi_domain_set_affinity() should be changed
to check whether parent->chip->irq_set_affinity is implemented?
msi_domain_set_affinity() has called parent->chip->irq_set_affinity()
without checking since it was added in 2014 by f3cf8bb0d6c3 ("genirq: Add
generic msi irq domain support"), so if there's a problem here, it's most
likely in the tango code.
> ...
> [ 1.135809] [<c0160eb4>] (msi_domain_set_affinity) from [<c015a864>] (irq_do_set_affinity+0x18/0x48)
> [ 1.144990] [<c015a864>] (irq_do_set_affinity) from [<c015a918>] (setup_affinity+0x84/0xd4)
> [ 1.153384] [<c015a918>] (setup_affinity) from [<c015b20c>] (__setup_irq+0x40c/0x5d4)
> [ 1.161254] [<c015b20c>] (__setup_irq) from [<c015b57c>] (request_threaded_irq+0xe4/0x184)
> [ 1.169569] [<c015b57c>] (request_threaded_irq) from [<c03102e0>] (aer_probe+0x9c/0x218)
> [ 1.177704] [<c03102e0>] (aer_probe) from [<c030e4bc>] (pcie_port_probe_service+0x34/0x70)
> [ 1.186017] [<c030e4bc>] (pcie_port_probe_service) from [<c0351cd0>] (really_probe+0x1c4/0x250)
> [ 1.194763] [<c0351cd0>] (really_probe) from [<c0351ec8>] (__device_attach_driver+0xa4/0xe0)
> [ 1.203245] [<c0351ec8>] (__device_attach_driver) from [<c0350274>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x60/0x94)
> [ 1.212076] [<c0350274>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0351abc>] (__device_attach+0x9c/0xdc)
> [ 1.220296] [<c0351abc>] (__device_attach) from [<c0351ff0>] (device_initial_probe+0xc/0x10)
> [ 1.228777] [<c0351ff0>] (device_initial_probe) from [<c0351090>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c)
> [ 1.237433] [<c0351090>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c034f484>] (device_add+0x3cc/0x548)
> [ 1.245390] [<c034f484>] (device_add) from [<c034f614>] (device_register+0x14/0x18)
> [ 1.253086] [<c034f614>] (device_register) from [<c030e8b8>] (pcie_port_device_register+0x3b0/0x450)
> [ 1.262267] [<c030e8b8>] (pcie_port_device_register) from [<c030ecfc>] (pcie_portdrv_probe+0x2c/0x50)
> [ 1.271539] [<c030ecfc>] (pcie_portdrv_probe) from [<c0302ba8>] (pci_device_probe+0x7c/0xc8)
> [ 1.280022] [<c0302ba8>] (pci_device_probe) from [<c0351c84>] (really_probe+0x178/0x250)
> [ 1.288154] [<c0351c84>] (really_probe) from [<c0351ec8>] (__device_attach_driver+0xa4/0xe0)
> [ 1.296635] [<c0351ec8>] (__device_attach_driver) from [<c0350274>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x60/0x94)
> [ 1.305465] [<c0350274>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0351abc>] (__device_attach+0x9c/0xdc)
> [ 1.313684] [<c0351abc>] (__device_attach) from [<c0351b08>] (device_attach+0xc/0x10)
> [ 1.321559] [<c0351b08>] (device_attach) from [<c02f9a20>] (pci_bus_add_device+0x44/0x90)
> [ 1.329778] [<c02f9a20>] (pci_bus_add_device) from [<c02f9aa8>] (pci_bus_add_devices+0x3c/0x80)
> [ 1.338523] [<c02f9aa8>] (pci_bus_add_devices) from [<c0312dfc>] (pci_host_common_probe+0x100/0x314)
> [ 1.347703] [<c0312dfc>] (pci_host_common_probe) from [<c0313550>] (tango_pcie_probe+0x138/0x340)
> [ 1.356624] [<c0313550>] (tango_pcie_probe) from [<c03532c4>] (platform_drv_probe+0x34/0x6c)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists