[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb5d08d6-bbbe-486f-b721-2eeeb410ab5e@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 20:07:53 +0200
From: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
David Laight <david.laight@...lab.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>,
Phuong Nguyen <phuong_nguyen@...madesigns.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Tango PCIe controller support
On 23/05/2017 19:17, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> This patch was split in two, to ease review of two orthogonal
>> parts (MSI controller and host bridge). NB: the patch is
>> just split in two where host bridge support starts.
>
> The split is backwards. The first patch should add basic host bridge
> support that is functional, though lacking MSI support. The second should
> add the MSI support.
OK, I'll invert the patches.
Note: the bridge does not support legacy interrupts.
Without MSI support, EPs can't interrupt the host.
Is that still considered functional?
Regards.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists