linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.11 150/197] arm64: entry: improve data abort handling of tagged pointers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170523200836.509374566@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 22:08:31 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.11 150/197] arm64: entry: improve data abort handling of tagged pointers

4.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>

commit 276e93279a630657fff4b086ba14c95955912dfa upstream.

When handling a data abort from EL0, we currently zero the top byte of
the faulting address, as we assume the address is a TTBR0 address, which
may contain a non-zero address tag. However, the address may be a TTBR1
address, in which case we should not zero the top byte. This patch fixes
that. The effect is that the full TTBR1 address is passed to the task's
signal handler (or printed out in the kernel log).

When handling a data abort from EL1, we leave the faulting address
intact, as we assume it's either a TTBR1 address or a TTBR0 address with
tag 0x00. This is true as far as I'm aware, we don't seem to access a
tagged TTBR0 address anywhere in the kernel. Regardless, it's easy to
forget about address tags, and code added in the future may not always
remember to remove tags from addresses before accessing them. So add tag
handling to the EL1 data abort handler as well. This also makes it
consistent with the EL0 data abort handler.

Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h |    9 +++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S            |    5 +++--
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h
@@ -62,4 +62,13 @@ alternative_if ARM64_ALT_PAN_NOT_UAO
 alternative_else_nop_endif
 	.endm

+/*
+ * Remove the address tag from a virtual address, if present.
+ */
+	.macro	clear_address_tag, dst, addr
+	tst	\addr, #(1 << 55)
+	bic	\dst, \addr, #(0xff << 56)
+	csel	\dst, \dst, \addr, eq
+	.endm
+
 #endif
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -428,12 +428,13 @@ el1_da:
 	/*
 	 * Data abort handling
 	 */
-	mrs	x0, far_el1
+	mrs	x3, far_el1
 	enable_dbg
 	// re-enable interrupts if they were enabled in the aborted context
 	tbnz	x23, #7, 1f			// PSR_I_BIT
 	enable_irq
 1:
+	clear_address_tag x0, x3
 	mov	x2, sp				// struct pt_regs
 	bl	do_mem_abort

@@ -594,7 +595,7 @@ el0_da:
 	// enable interrupts before calling the main handler
 	enable_dbg_and_irq
 	ct_user_exit
-	bic	x0, x26, #(0xff << 56)
+	clear_address_tag x0, x26
 	mov	x1, x25
 	mov	x2, sp
 	bl	do_mem_abort