lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170524000018.GF11878@marvin.atrad.com.au>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 09:30:18 +0930
From:   Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>
To:     Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fujitsu-laptop: use device-specific data instead
 of module-wide globals

Hi Michael

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 08:53:23AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:44:40AM +0200, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> > fujitsu-laptop registers two ACPI drivers that access each other's
> > module-wide structures.  To improve data encapsulation and lay the
> > groundwork for separating the two aforementioned ACPI drivers into
> > separate modules, move away from module-wide global data structures by
> > using device-specific data instead.
> > :
> 
> I have had a quick look through this series.  To my eye it addresses the
> outcome of our discussion over the last couple of weeks, and looks good.  I
> had one query regarding patch 5/8, but that might just be a case of me not
> knowing about a subtlety of WARN_ONCE().  In any case this isn't a major
> issue and would be easily resolved if needed.
> 
> Once I get feedback on patch 5/8 (and after seeing any additional comments
> from Darren et al) I can send through a reviewed-by.

With the minor query in 5.8 sorted, I'm happy to proceed with this (subject
of course to any further comments from Darren or Andy).  While not an
endpoint in and of itslef, it is never-the-less an important step towards
the agreed goal to separate the fujitsu-laptop module into two drivers. 
This is motivated by the current use of two ACPI devices by the single
fujitsu-laptop module, which is inconsistent with the kernel's "one driver
per module" approach.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>

Regards
  jonathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ