[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170524215136.itrsuwtthq65s3av@arbab-laptop.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 16:51:37 -0500
From: Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
qiuxishi@...wei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com>,
slaoub@...il.com, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm, memory_hotplug: drop CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>20b2f52b73fe ("numa: add CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE for movable-dedicated
>node") has introduced CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE without a good explanation on
>why it is actually useful. It makes a lot of sense to make movable node
>semantic opt in but we already have that because the feature has to be
>explicitly enabled on the kernel command line. A config option on top
>only makes the configuration space larger without a good reason. It also
>adds an additional ifdefery that pollutes the code. Just drop the config
>option and make it de-facto always enabled. This shouldn't introduce any
>change to the semantic.
Acked-by: Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Reza Arbab
Powered by blists - more mailing lists