[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877f1525qq.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 23:34:46 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Simon <horms@...ge.net.au>, <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm: dw-hdmi-i2s: add .get_dai_id callback for ALSA SoC
Hi Mark
Cc: DRM maintainer
> > ALSA SoC needs to know connected DAI ID for probing.
> > It is not a big problem if device/driver was only for sound,
> > but getting DAI ID will be difficult if device includes both
> > Video/Sound, like HDMI.
>
> As far as I understand what's going on with the graph code this seems to
> make sense to me. How do we want to go about handling the patch?
This is comment to me ? or DRM maintainer ?
If to me, any case (pickup by Mark, or by DRM maintainer) is OK for me
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists