linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regular setting for act8846

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJrj+DMU5XP9vHt60F8Uf7BTfv13DQQUoVXs0Fv2nKbWH8xKYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 16:50:51 +0800
From:   Eddie Cai <eddie.cai.linux@...il.com>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regular setting for act8846

2017-05-24 16:47 GMT+08:00 Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>:
> Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017, 16:44:05 CEST schrieb Eddie Cai:
>> 2017-05-24 16:17 GMT+08:00 Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>:
>> > Hi Eddie,
>> >
>> > Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017, 15:33:41 CEST schrieb Eddie Cai:
>> >> the previous setting of act8846 is just copy from firefly board. but
>> >> the reload board is a little different from firefly board. let's correct
>> >> it.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Eddie Cai <eddie.cai.linux@...il.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload-core.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++----------
>> >>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload-core.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload-core.dtsi
>> >> index 8134966..4cfa109 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload-core.dtsi
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload-core.dtsi
>> >> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@
>> >>                               regulator-name = "vccio_sd";
>> >>                               regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> >>                               regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> >> +                             regulator-always-on;
>> >
>> > the rest below looks pretty straight forward, but why does vccio_sd
>> > need to be always on?
>> >
>> > I've checked the reload's schematics but did not find any further users
>> > of vccio_sd that may warant this attribute.
>> Oh, It's default on. thank you for point out my mistake. I will modify
>> it in next version.
>
> not default-on, but the mmc-core will turn on the vccio regulator on its
> own during probe. So yes, please fix :-) .
I mean it will be default on by hardware from schematics. I just modify it to
regulator-boot-on and send v1 patch
>
>
> Thanks
> Heiko
>