linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/24] thunderbolt: Introduce thunderbolt bus and connection manager

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 12:28:21 +0200
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
        Amir Levy <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Mario.Limonciello@...l.com,
        Jared.Dominguez@...l.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] thunderbolt: Introduce thunderbolt bus and
 connection manager

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:38:56PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Thunderbolt fabric consists of one or more switches. This fabric is
> called domain and it is controlled by an entity called connection
> manager. The connection manager can be either internal (driven by a
> firmware running on the host controller) or external (software driver).
> This driver currently implements support for the latter.
> 
> In order to manage switches and their properties more easily we model
> this domain structure as a Linux bus. Each host controller adds a domain
> device to this bus, and these devices are named as domainN where N
> stands for index or id of the current domain.

What is the rationale for using a bus?  Do you intend to attach a driver
to each domain and/or switch?  Unless you do, a class might be more
appropriate.

Thanks,

Lukas