linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Prevent uninitialized stack byte read in apply

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 15:04:18 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@...gle.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Prevent uninitialized stack byte read in
 apply_alternatives()

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:51:20PM +0200, Mateusz Jurczyk wrote:
> In the current form of the code, if a->replacementlen is 0, the reference
> to *insnbuf for comparison touches potentially garbage memory. While it
> doesn't affect the execution flow due to the subsequent a->replacementlen
> comparison, it is (rightly) detected as use of uninitialized memory by a
> runtime instrumentation currently under my development, and could be
> detected as such by other tools in the future, too (e.g. KMSAN).
> 
> Fix the "false-positive" by reordering the conditions to first check the
> replacement instruction length before referencing specific opcode bytes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> index c5b8f760473c..d03ba6bc97d8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_alternatives(struct alt_instr *start,
>  		insnbuf_sz = a->replacementlen;
>  
>  		/* 0xe8 is a relative jump; fix the offset. */

Sure but put in short the reason to look at the instruction length first
in the comment above so that it is clear why we're doing it this way.

> -		if (*insnbuf == 0xe8 && a->replacementlen == 5) {
> +		if (a->replacementlen == 5 && *insnbuf == 0xe8) {
>  			*(s32 *)(insnbuf + 1) += replacement - instr;
>  			DPRINTK("Fix CALL offset: 0x%x, CALL 0x%lx",
>  				*(s32 *)(insnbuf + 1),
> -- 

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--