Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 15:37:37 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Liang Z Li <liang.z.li@...el.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Julliard <julliard@...ehq.org>,
        Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-msdos@...r.kernel.org, wine-devel@...ehq.org,
        Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
        Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
        Nathan Howard <liverlint@...il.com>,
        Adan Hawthorn <adanhawthorn@...il.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/26] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.index if its value is
 100b and ModRM.mod is not 11b

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:17:02AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Section 2.2.1.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when ModRM.mod !=11b and
> ModRM.rm = 100b indexed register-indirect addressing is used. In other
> words, a SIB byte follows the ModRM byte. In the specific case of
> SIB.index = 100b, the scale*index portion of the computation of the
> effective address is null. To signal callers of this particular situation,
> get_reg_offset() can return -EDOM (-EINVAL continues to indicate that an
> error when decoding the SIB byte).
> 
> An example of this situation can be the following instruction:
> 
>    8b 4c 23 80       mov -0x80(%rbx,%riz,1),%rcx
>    ModRM:            0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b]
>    SIB:              0x23 [scale:0b][index:100b][base:11b]
>    Displacement:     0x80  (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b)
> 
> The %riz 'register' indicates a null index.
> 
> In long mode, a REX prefix may be used. When a REX prefix is present,
> REX.X adds a fourth bit to the register selection of SIB.index. This gives
> the ability to refer to all the 16 general purpose registers. When REX.X is
> 1b and SIB.index is 100b, the index is indicated in %r12. In our example,
> this would look like:
> 
>    42 8b 4c 23 80    mov -0x80(%rbx,%r12,1),%rcx
>    REX:              0x42 [W:0b][R:0b][X:1b][B:0b]
>    ModRM:            0x4c [mod:1b][reg:1b][rm:100b]
>    SIB:              0x23 [scale:0b][.X: 1b, index:100b][.B:0b, base:11b]
>    Displacement:     0x80  (1-byte, as per ModRM.mod = 1b)
> 
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>
> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
> Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Nathan Howard <liverlint@...il.com>
> Cc: Adan Hawthorn <adanhawthorn@...il.com>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
> index ebdead8..7397b81 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,14 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
>  		regno = X86_SIB_INDEX(insn->sib.value);
>  		if (X86_REX_X(insn->rex_prefix.value))
>  			regno += 8;

<--- newline.

> +		/*
> +		 * If ModRM.mod !=3 and SIB.index (regno=4) the scale*index
> +		 * portion of the address computation is null. This is
> +		 * true only if REX.X is 0. In such a case, the SIB index
> +		 * is used in the address computation.
> +		 */
> +		if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) != 3 && regno == 4)
> +			return -EDOM;
>  		break;
>  
>  	case REG_TYPE_BASE:
> @@ -159,11 +167,19 @@ static void __user *mpx_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  				goto out_err;
>  
>  			indx_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_INDEX);
> -			if (indx_offset < 0)

<--- newline.

> +			/*
> +			 * A negative offset generally means a error, except

							     an

> +			 * -EDOM, which means that the contents of the register
> +			 * should not be used as index.
> +			 */
> +			if (indx_offset == -EDOM)
> +				indx = 0;
> +			else if (indx_offset < 0)
>  				goto out_err;
> +			else
> +				indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset);
>  
>  			base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset);
> -			indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset);
>  			eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib));
>  		} else {
>  			addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
> -- 
> 2.9.3
> 

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists