[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170524143932.11593845@alans-desktop>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 14:39:32 +0100
From: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Delete unused function
ipc_data_readb()
On Tue, 23 May 2017 13:55:39 -0700
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> The function was added by commit 0a8b83530b6f ("intel_pmc_ipc: Add Intel
> Apollo Lake PMC IPC driver") in 2015 and hasn't been used since then.
> Removing it fixes the following warning when building with clang:
>
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c:189:18: error: unused function
> 'ipc_data_readb' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
It is however also part of the API and a consistent sensible function to
have present should it be needed. As it's static it's eliminated
correctly by gcc.
I'm all for eliminating unused functions but in this case I have to wonder
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists