lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23673.1495634085@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 14:54:45 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] efi: Move the x86 secure boot switch to generic code

Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:

> > +         UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the firmware
> > +         will only load signed bootloaders and kernels.  Secure boot mode may
> > +         be determined from EFI variables provided by the BIOS if not
> 
> Please replace 'the BIOS' with something more generic.

"Firmware" or "System firmware" maybe?

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ